Grades have been updated in Blackboard. Please check these to make sure they are in line with what you think you turned in.
As of this morning, only four students have emailed me a screenshot of their proof that they completed the course eval! (There's a link below to accessing this, and I will reiterate that I will award you an extra credit participation point--which works out to be about 3% of your total participation grade-- if you do this. PLEASE, PLEASE do this, even if you don't need the extra credit. I will love you forever if you just DO THE EVAL.
Portfolios are due WEDNESDAY, DEC 14, by 12:30 P.M. in your student folder of Dropbox. If for some reason you doubt it is uploading to Dropbox properly, email it to me. Better to be safe. The portfolio is worth a whopping 50% of your total grade, and I WILL NOT ACCEPT IT LATE. As in, if you turn the Portfolio in at 12:45, you will fail my class.
I just want to say again what a total pleasure it was to teach this class, and I wish you all the very best, both in your submission (woohoo! first submission!) and in your writing lives. Please keep in touch. The email that will work best for this is writercynthiahand@gmail.com. Let me know the outcome of your submissions! And please, feel free to use me as a reference and approach me if you feel you're ready to start trying to get published.
I'm eager to read your portfolios!
CH
ENGL 407: Advanced Fiction
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Sunday, December 4, 2016
Revision Resources
Here's a link to seriously one of my favorite articles regarding revision, EVER, "Revising Your Prose for Power and Punch."
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i372l2qwua9pswd/David%20Michael%20Kaplan%20Revising%20Your%20Prose%20For%20Power%20and%20Punch.doc?dl=0
I've also included Kit Reed's "What to Leave Out and What to Put In"
https://www.dropbox.com/s/m9umfs2iysq2xjt/Kit%20Reed%20What%20to%20Leave%20Out%20and%20What%20to%20Put%20In.doc?dl=0
and Jesse Lee Kerchival's "Revision," (which I couldn't link here for some reason, but all three of these articles will be in a new "Revision Articles" folder of our class Dropbox.)
Happy revising!
https://www.dropbox.com/s/i372l2qwua9pswd/David%20Michael%20Kaplan%20Revising%20Your%20Prose%20For%20Power%20and%20Punch.doc?dl=0
I've also included Kit Reed's "What to Leave Out and What to Put In"
https://www.dropbox.com/s/m9umfs2iysq2xjt/Kit%20Reed%20What%20to%20Leave%20Out%20and%20What%20to%20Put%20In.doc?dl=0
and Jesse Lee Kerchival's "Revision," (which I couldn't link here for some reason, but all three of these articles will be in a new "Revision Articles" folder of our class Dropbox.)
Happy revising!
Friday, December 2, 2016
Portfolio Time
It's portfolio time. So here's what I want in your portfolio:
- One of your two revised short stories, formatted exactly to submission standards, ready to go on submission. (Times New Roman, 1 inch margins, page number with your name on the top right--I will put a sample of this in Dropbox.)
- A query letter for said story. (see the post immediately before this one for an example)
- A SASE (stamped), if you are sending out via snail mail.
- A larger manila or priority envelope, if you are sending out via snail mail. (I will pay postage.)
- A letter to ME, about your progress and analysis of the class, which I will keep.
- 2 of your very best workshop responses.
All of these things can be turned in at the ASH lobby between 12:00 and 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday the 13th OR in your specific student folder (the one with your name on it) in the Dropbox. Just make a folder for yourself entitled FINAL PORTFOLIO and clearly label everything that goes in that folder. If you are sending your submission via the internet, please send me a screenshot of your confirmation that you have submitted the story. Visit this website if you need instructions on how to take a screenshot.
Final Letter Guidelines
The letter should answer some or all of the following questions:
1) What was your attitude about writing (and publishing) before you entered this class?
2) How were these ideas about writing (and publishing), listed above, challenged or affirmed in this course? What challenged them? What was your favorite Conversational Topic?
3) What was your writing process like during the course? What did you feel was your biggest achievement? How did you grow as a writer?
4) How would you evaluate your “level of engagement” in the course? How intellectually engaged were you with the readings we read, the workshops, and finally, your own work?
5) How did the readings impact your own sense of creative writing? What were your favorite pieces? What were the pieces that most affected you, challenged you, made you see another way of thinking? What pieces did you struggle with the most, and how did you respond to that friction?
6) (mandatory) How did Jerome Stern affect your ideas about writing? How did you see his ideas working through the published stories that we read? Give at least one clear example of something Stern wrote about that you could apply to one of the stories that we read.
7) What do you want me to know before I read your portfolio? How do you want me to consider it? What grade do you believe you deserve in this class? Why?
The best final analysis letters are the ones that vividly show me your process as a writer, using specific texts, making specific reference to moments in the class or moments in your writing, referring to and even quoting your own work and the work of others. In other words, specificity is the key. Don’t write this letter in general terms, saying that “this was good,” or “I didn’t understand this. . .” Dig deep into your experience. Ask questions, and try valiantly to answer them.
Query letters
So it's about that time for you to be drafting your query letters! Can you believe that you're about to send out your first submission?!
Below I've pasted my own query letter, which I sent to my first publication, The Iowa Review, almost exactly thirteen years ago, I'm just now noticing. Wow. A lot can happen in thirteen years.
Feel free to use this as a basic template for your own letter. They should all look basically the same.
2225 S. 27th Street
Lincoln, NE 68502
402-742-4150
Cindybojam1@aol.com
University of Iowa
308 EPB
Iowa City, IA, 52242
Cynthia Hand
Below I've pasted my own query letter, which I sent to my first publication, The Iowa Review, almost exactly thirteen years ago, I'm just now noticing. Wow. A lot can happen in thirteen years.
Feel free to use this as a basic template for your own letter. They should all look basically the same.
2225 S. 27th Street
Lincoln, NE 68502
402-742-4150
Cindybojam1@aol.com
November 25, 2003
Fiction Editor
Iowa ReviewUniversity of Iowa
308 EPB
Iowa City, IA, 52242
Dear Editor:
Please find enclosed my short story, “The Sugar Shell,” for your consideration. If accepted, this will be my first published story.
This past May I completed a short story collection entitled What the Good Is. “The Sugar Shell” is the first of nine stories set in rural Idaho near the Teton mountains, where I lived for almost twenty years. Currently I teach creative writing at the University of Nebraska Lincoln and also serve on the editorial staff of Prairie Schooner. In the past I’ve read for The Idaho Review and screened poetry book manuscripts for Ahsahta Press. In various workshops, I’ve worked with Robert Olmstead, Mitch Wieland, Greg Hrbek, Anthony Doerr, and Jonis Agee.
A SASE is enclosed for your reply. There is no need to return the manuscript. I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Cynthia Hand
Thursday, December 1, 2016
Course Evals
Here's the link to the course evals. If you send me a screen shot or something, proving you completed this, I will give you an extra participation point. So yay, extra credit!
https://ir.boisestate.edu/broncocourseevals/student-course-evals/
I will also pick your brain about how you felt the course went next week.
Thanks for being awesome.
Cynthia
https://ir.boisestate.edu/broncocourseevals/student-course-evals/
I will also pick your brain about how you felt the course went next week.
Thanks for being awesome.
Cynthia
Saturday, November 19, 2016
Journal Reports Round 3
Lindsey:
1) REAL: Regarding Arts & Letters;
“Literary Ladder”: Mid
This
magazine is produced by the Stephen F. Austin State University in Texas;
founded in 1968, it’s since grown to become an international publication. The magazine accepts work from both aspiring
writers and more seasoned members of the creative world. These editors are “looking for the best work,
whether you are established or not”.
They’re interested in literary stories, not genre.
2) Subtropics; “Literary Ladder”: Mid
This
is produced by the University of Florida; it was only established eleven years
ago, but it has a few authors that have been published in it, including John
Barth and Tony D’Souza. Like REAL, they’re looking for “the best”
stories - however, they accept more types of work, from short-shorts to
novellas and novel excerpts. They also
translate stories from other languages into English, which is fantastic; why
limit ourselves to enjoying stories from only one section of the world?
3) Space and Time magazine; “Literary
Ladder”: Mid
I
already know that I won’t be submitting my short story to this journal, as it
specializes in science-fiction, fantasy, steampunk, and crossovers of these
genres. However, this class has been as
much about the process of publishing as about improving one’s writing, and I
have always enjoyed writing sci-fi/fantasy.
Space and Time magazine has
been around for 50 years, so they must be doing something right; while this
publication will not be a good fit for the story I have worked on in this
class, it certainly has potential for me in the future.
If I choose to submit to one of these three, I think that Subtropics might be the way to go as it fits with our genre and seems to have the most flexibility: it accepts submissions up to 15,000 words in length. Mine definitely won’t be that long, but it’s nice to know I’d have that option if I wanted or needed it. Also, Subtropics accepts submissions from September-April, which is perfect timing for our final portfolio. While I’m still not entirely decided on where I’d like to submit my work, this assignment has certainly helped narrow my focus and add perspective to my choices.
Joy:
Louisville Review:
Ladder
status: Lower, as in second or third tier.
Fairly respected because it runs out of the
University of Louisville and works closely
with Spalding University's MFA writing
program. Was founded in 1998 and
have published eighteen books, 13 of them debut
novels. Many of these books have been endorsed by
Billy Collins, Tim O’Brien, and
more.
Fiction
Published: seems to focus on writing that is located in one place, as in regional
writing.
Tend to lean towards shorter stories
in order to get more in the issue. Have published
writers like Stephen Dunn, Claudia
Emerson, and Ursula Hegi.
Cottonwood:
Ladder
status: Mid. Established in the 60’s and
based out of University of Kansas. Have
published William Stafford, Rita
Dove, and Connie May Fowler.
Fiction
Published: Honest, high quality fiction, with engaging voice and style with
emotional
honesty.
They are very open to new writer’s work and will take pieces that have
already
been rejected.
The writing must be sound, but the story is more important.
NOTE:
This is the one that I am most interested in Submitting to.
Blackbird:
Laddar
Status: Higher, as in upper second or lower first. Out of Virginia Commonwealth
University Department of
English. Online publication
Fiction
Published: Nothing more than 8,000 words (although it can be done, must ask
first).
Looking for stories that are
engaging, and invites the reader into it’s world. Also willing
to publish new authors.
Rob:
Name: Zoetrope
Tier Position: First Tier
Literary Status: Yes
Agent Read: Yes
Why this Journal: This journal was started by Francis Ford
Coppola as a venue for artists to publish their work. It has grown into many
genres like poetry, fiction, non-fiction, and cinema. I’m interested in this
journal because it seems to publish a wide variety of subjects and they don’t
shy away from sensitive subjects like drugs and sex. Plus it being such an all
encompassing journal, I figure a wide variety of agents probably read it
looking for something different.
Name: The Sun
Tier Position: Second Tier
Literary Status: Yes
Agent Read: Maybe
Why this Journal: This journal was started in the seventies
and was initially interested in political issues. It still seems relevant to
controversial issues, so it seems to me that they are willing to look at more
mature material (since my material seems to be a bit risqué). They currently
seem to focus a lot on social and societal issues. Though they do seem to focus
more on non-fiction matters. I don’t know if agents read this journal since it
doesn’t seem to be primarily focused on fiction.
Name: Crazyhorse
Tier Position: Third Tier
Literary Status: Yes
Agent Read: Yes
Why this Journal: Why wouldn’t anyone want to get published
in something called Crazyhorse? But really, it looks like an interesting
literary journal with a pretty good history of publishing authors of note. Like
the others I mentioned above, they don’t seem afraid of mature subject matters
and publishing them either.
Samantha:
Conjunctions
●
Middle tier journal. It is
respected, and an agent would read this journal, especially since it publishes
writing every week that is of exceptional quality and free to read!
●
“Writer of the week:” The free
weekly online journal showcases the work of one writer each week. This journal
acts as a place to publish exceptional work that doesn’t fit into the theme of
a given anthology, to feature high-quality visual work, and to delve into
e-writing. Even if you don’t make it into the journal, you can still get
published on their online journal!
●
Literary fiction that also leans
towards genre, depending on the theme; essays, film reviews, prose, etc.
●
They publish biannually, and their
volumes are quite long. They are more willing to take on longer stories because
they need to fill a thick book.
●
They take submissions from new
writers and writers that are well-published.
●
Authors published: C.D. Wright,
David Foster Wallace, Robert O’Harra
High
Desert Journal
●
Between a lower and middle tier. It
is online only, so obviously not as respected as journals that have physical
publications. It is also free to read. Agents would read this as it is
accessible wherever there is internet at no cost.
●
It is an online journal with a
constant theme: to understand the people, places and issues of the interior
West. The journal’s content helps define the high desert region in literary and
artistic terms through quality work that illuminates the landscape of the
interior West, the people and the relationships between the two.
●
One of the first publications to
give readers another way to understand and think about the high desert: through
the stories and images that spring from the memories and imaginations of
writers and artists through fiction, creative nonfiction, memoirs, interviews,
essays, book reviews, letters to the editor and visual art.
●
Accepts work from: residents of the
region working with any theme; from anyone living outside the region writing
about high desert themes and elements.
●
For each submission, you can do:
three poems; a maximum of 5,000 words of fiction or nonfiction; up to 3,000
words of interview, memoir, and essays; up to 10 slides or digital images of
artwork.
●
Authors published: Robert Wrigely-
professor at University of Idaho
Ploughshares
●
Top tier. Award winning, an agent
would most definitely read this!
●
Ploughshares has published quality literature
since 1971. Best known for award-winning Ploughshares
literary journal. Also publishes Ploughshares Solos, “digital-first” long
stories and essays, and a literary blog. Basically there are 3 different ways
to get published!
●
Encourage emerging writers with
“Emerging Writer’s Contest”-recognizes work by an emerging writer in each of
three genres: fiction, nonfiction, and poetry. One winner in each genre per
year will receive $1,000 and publication in the literary journal (authors are
“emerging” if they haven’t published or self-published a book).
●
To submit: unsolicited submissions
of fiction, poetry, and nonfiction during regular reading period, from June 1
to January 15. The literary journal is published three times a year: mixed
issues of poetry and prose in the Spring and Winter and a prose issue in the
Fall
●
Guest editors are invited to solicit
up to half of their issues, with the other half selected from manuscripts
submitted to the journal are screened for them by staff editors. This policy is
“designed to introduce readers to different literary circles and tastes, and to
offer a fuller representation of the range and diversity of contemporary
letters than would be possible with a single editorship.”
●
Authors: Edward P. Jones, Sue
Miller, Mona Simpson, Tim O’Brien
I would like to submit to Ploughshares’s journal. The story I would like to submit is too
long for the journal, but I could still submit it as it can still be considered
for the Ploughshares Solos series. I want to submit it to Ploughshares to the Emerging Writer’s Contest for a chance at
$1,000 and being published in the journal. It would be a great opportunity to
be published as it could be the starting off point to my career, and hopefully
attract agents that could help me get started writing professionally.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)